Видео

Copy the principle of "air multiplication" from a Dyson fan?

WOW!!!.... good work.... have you ever thought about using an "granite" housing/outercasing.... highly conductive.....

Unsubbing, cuz better help is a sponsor and it's a very corrupt company!

What kind of gases did you expose yourself to.

I love that part of the design change is you've moved from 'how fast can we push air' to the more important question 'how much air can we push'.

You know those experiments where an arc to a toroidal magnet rotates around the magnet? I wonder if making an ironic thruster doing something like that would have a benefit. Maybe having it arc from one toroidal magnet to another to form an hourglass shape will result in more airflow due to the Bernoulli effect. Maybe it would also effectively create a larger area of plasma for more thrust than the single points with nearly 1 dimensional arcs of plasma.

It would probably help to make the design progressively thinner

the triangle shape also allows for a lot more a steerable thrust as well. more voltage on 2 sides vs 1 should direct air flow directions. it also seems like it would benefit from being able to adjust the gaps at run time. like say adjustment threads using a non conductive metal. since it looked like voltage / gap = trust able to adjust more variables during runtime should help with experimentation time. and might uncover extremes that weren't expected.

How about spaced in a spiral so you'll have a vortex ?

Hi😊

Would funneling the design with air intake holes in each chamber cause an increase in output?

If you could make it round you could get a more efficient air flow as if it could spiral like a tornado.

What if you attempted changing the angle on each segment so that instead of the air from each segment joining with itself. The air from all the segments join together all at the end.

AVP 👽 ..../ But hey 😹 / / ...the darts ,?/ Well / but / /

👍👍👍👍

So many questions, please answer some! What would happen with the triangle shape if you rotated each section 60°? What would happen if you combined 6 of the triangle shapes into a hexagon? What would happen if you made the whole thing a hexagon shape? Question about 3d printing in general, why don’t people print 3D molds that you could pour plastic in instead of waiting the long times for the 3d printing process to finish?

I love your experiments. Was just thinking what if you have only one air flow intake and one airflow exhaust? Meaning close all the sides that are open? Perhaps cling film wrapped around the device? But having only the intake and exit open but sides closed? And the "exhaust " perhaps a 3rd the size of the intake?🙌🦾 keep up the good work

Random question from a layperson with a game-design-related interest in real-world space drive technologies. Why must this design use straight lines (and thus be geometric, such as this triangular drive) instead of making a thruster that's circular? If you aren't getting the constructive interference you expect, it may be because the airflow from the edges of the triangle are closer to the center than the corners, and converge in a different place, causing turbulence. Another thought - instead of recording it blowing dry ice fog, record it sucking dry ice fog, including at lower power. This may show you where turbulence occurs, and let you hone in on designs with smoother airflow. Last thought - rather than measuring air volume and air velocity, measure thrust. You're making a thruster, the only useful metric of efficiency for a thruster is thrust.

Did you just do that

The "diminishing returns" in adding stages may not be diminishing returns. I'm thinking, kinetic energy is m * v-squared. So, the 50% speed increment of the second stage represents 2.25 times the energy; and so on. If I'm right, the second stage transfers more power than the first. The problem is that what benefits propulsion is momentum, rather than kinetic energy of the exhaust.

Cool

How did you calculate L/s?

not better help!

The amount of dunning-kruger in this comments section is honestly mind blowing.

Looks like a valorant portal

I agree with the other guy better help is to expensive to be helpfull im autistic and broke and i actuly need therapy but i dont need to waist my hard eared money on 10 min of rubish i would rather build a 3 phase inverce bypas earospike engine in order to excape the reality that is earth

Nice small module! But - sorry to say - from an engineers point of view: the good part stops there. From building a thruster but not measuring the thrust (Thrust/Watt? Thrust/Weight? Efficiency?) to ignoring Bernoullis law ... only measuring the airspeed for efficiency plus not realizing the connection to kinetic energy is strange. And how about making protokols? You did enough in the Gym, now get your science in shape. Please. You definitely could use some help.

Use this setup to add rf resonance to match the elemental bond natural frequency Wana see for a friend

how do you get dry ice? In my country you can only buy it in bulks of 50Kg and its terrible!

Hey just a thought, 3d cylinder tesla valve for the air, create a path of least resistance for one direction flow but have that resistance feature to catch any unwanted deviations

I like what you do😍, but I'm honestly jealous of you😩. What you do physically for me was experimented only in my imagination 1-2 years ago. I hope that one day I will have the resources to experiment, everything goes through my head.😤

I think having the stages that close isn't allowing the streams from each stage to converge before hitting the turbulence from the next stages. May want to try spacing them farther apart, but with shielding to prevent more air coming in, but have SOME air input to prevent a low pressure / vacuum area formation between stages. That would allow each stage to fully converge before being added to or even wrapped with the next stage column. As I was typing this, I also thought that, if you alter the angles of each stage, you may get coaxial flow where the stages can "wrap" the column of the previous and allow for, maybe not more velocity, but more total mass flow, resulting in more overall power output. You can't totally think of the velocity alone, but how much air is being moved at said velocity. 2m/s for 3 L/s is going to be more power than 4m/s for 1L/s. You simply have more kinetic energy being output. Air is approx 1.2g/L, so for the above you would have 60mN vs vs 47mN, respectively.

Cool video, cool concept. Seeing the improvements from the MK. I thruster is pretty impressive. That being said, at the risk of sounding entitled, I do hope that you consider dropping BetterHelp as a sponsor until they change their ways and their rather disingenuous tactics regarding both patients privacy and safety, and their hiring of qualified professionals. Many comments, although I do agree that some are and can be harsh or out there, do generally agree that the company is simply harming the individuals it’s claiming to help. All in all, I only wish for the channel to grow and succeed, and that this project evolves to one day having a rather successful ionic thruster/wing.

I'm curious if there would be a significant difference in added thrust with imput air already at significant speed (aka an engine on a moving plane compared to tests with the engine standing still).

BetterHelp is a scam, please don't take their money to advertise it to your viewers

being in South Africa i don't think I'm going to OpenSauce any time soon :(

Question, would increasing the flow on the direct outside make it better, as it would have more air to redirect? With it being on a wing, the increase flow outside would be present past initial start up? Or would this be a non factor?

totusi la ce im-mi foloseste scanteia

Молодец!

Just reminding everyone that BetterHelp is a shady scam service that will sell your private data

Collab with @majorhardware

Venturi is your friend.

Figure out a way to cool a pc with one and I will partner with you to take it to market.

this gives you thrust vectoring in any direction for free, just change the voltage on each side.

Did you use a normal 12 v batter or??

After some brief calculations your numbers indicate 24 lb of thrust which doesn’t make sense since that thing would be moving with those numbers

Hey the advertisment for the dewalt tools is bunk, you go through the questionaire, at the end they ask fir your zip. Then they say not available in your area. Its pure deceptive advertising

Capacitor manufacturers like this game very much! Ha ha ha...

So given a static thrust measurement what m/s do you calculate you need for a feather light aircraft? Where is the threshold? Roughly.

Very interesting !! With electromagnetic thrusters, the power is pulsed, and the transit time from stage to stage is factored into the pulse timing to ensure synchronicity from thrust / impulse stage to thrust/ impulse stage. In a less dynamic engine, your thrust is a continuously powered device with static / fixed power applied for the continuous thrust model. Would pulsed HV control show a dynamic and interactive thrust based on ion charge and ionized air transit time from stage to stage? Just curiosity at this point, as I am totally unaware of the aerodynamic properties involved in continuous ionic thrust models and my old TI calculator would have a hemorrhage trying to compute the static and dynamic interactions. Your models have shown great promise which does, indicate the voltage source is quite important as shown with the single supply air velocity measurements versus multiple power source models, and the intricacies of drag combined with element spacing. This is just the maundering of an old fart trying to grasp the static -vs- dynamic interactions as envisioned by thoughts on antiquated ducted fan experiments. Good Luck and smooth air transitions !!! Best wishes and may the principles of Heisenberg and Murphy's Law avoid your Lab !!!